Active Investigation · The Case
What the coordinated litigation alleges.
Hundreds of personal-injury actions filed in California courts have been coordinated as the “Social Media Cases” in Los Angeles Superior Court. The master complaint describes an unprecedented youth mental-health crisis — and lays out how it happened.
Start your case review.
The core allegations
Defective by design, and a failure to warn.
The master complaint alleges the defendants designed defective products, concealed what they knew, and failed to warn the families whose children used them. In the words of the U.S. Surgeon General, children versus these companies is “just not a fair fight.”
Engineered to hold attention
- Endless, algorithmically generated feeds
- Intermittent-reward mechanics that mirror gambling
- Notifications engineered to pull teens back in
- Metrics — likes, streaks, view counts — that convert self-worth into a score
Aimed at the young
- Children and teens central to growth strategy
- Design choices exploiting adolescent neurodevelopment
- Inadequate age verification for users under 13
- A generation reached before parents understood the risk
Known — and concealed
- Internal research linking use to teen harm
- Findings withheld from parents and the public
- No adequate warnings on any platform
- Growth pursued despite documented risk
Individual claims are brought for families, not states The Meta™ settlement
What the states’ agreement requires.
Just over a week into trial, Meta™ agreed to resolve claims brought by more than two dozen state attorneys general — a settlement that could reach $16.7 billion, with $11.6 billion guaranteed to the states.
Beyond money, the agreement reshapes the products themselves: verified minimum ages, two-hour daily default limits for teens, nighttime blocks, notification pauses during school hours, and hidden like counts — with parents able to adjust the defaults. Meta™ called the changes a new industry standard and urged TikTok™, Snap™, and YouTube™ to follow.
What it did not resolve: the claims of individual families. The state settlement compensates states. The coordinated personal-injury cases — brought for the young people themselves — continue. That is where our investigation is focused.
How we got here
A short history of the litigation.
Leaked internal documents reveal that at least one platform’s own studies connected its products to harm among teenage users, igniting congressional hearings and public scrutiny.
Personal-injury lawsuits are filed across the country. California cases are coordinated in Los Angeles Superior Court as the “Social Media Cases,” alongside a parallel federal proceeding.
More than two dozen state attorneys general sue Meta™ over youth mental-health harms and children’s-privacy violations. The coordinated proceeding’s master complaint details the design-defect and failure-to-warn allegations.
Days into trial, Meta™ agrees to a settlement worth up to $16.7 billion plus sweeping product changes for teen users. The individual families’ cases continue.
This summary is based on the coordinated proceeding’s public filings and public reporting, and will be updated as the litigation develops.
Active investigation